BCAN's Patient Handbook - Bladder Cancer Basics for the Newly Diagnosed



Donate Now to Support the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network



Join The Online Bladder Cancer Support Community



The Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) is proud to announce that we have been designated a Marine Corps Marathon (MCM) Charity Partner! BCAN has been allocated 25 guaranteed entries for the 38th Annual Marine Corps Marathon to be held on October 27, 2013; an event that sold out in 2 hours and 41 minutes in 2012.
  • We are looking at building “Team BCAN” to not only run in the event and raise awareness for bladder cancer but to raise needed funds for fostering research and patient education. According to the Marine Corps Marathon, there is not a required qualifying time to participate in the event, but all runners should maintain at least a 14 minute mile pace. In order to become a member of “Team BCAN” and officially have a slot in this year’s race, you must be registered through BCAN.
  • No federal or Marine Corps endorsement is implied.
  • If you are interested in becoming a member of BCAN’s team or have any questions, please contact Larry Rzepka, BCAN’s Executive Director, at lrzepka@bcan.org.
  • newsletterheader-2.jpg

    Ask the Doctor

    Winter 2008

    Our questions for this issue of Outlook were answered by Dr. Arthur Sagalowsky, Professor and Chief of Urologic Oncology at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, TX. We sincerely appreciate his sharing his opinions and impressions with us.

    Q: Is it safe to have sexual intercourse while undergoing BCG treatments?

    A: This is an excellent and very practical question about which there is embarrassingly little information. When introducing BCG, the catheter must be introduced without injuring or damaging the urethra, and recent biopsy sites must have healed to minimize the risk of infecting the patient with live BCG. Despite these precautions, some patients develop fever, rare systemic infection, and a small percentage of men may develop inflammatory conditions in their prostate or scrotum. In theory, men could shed BCG organisms in the urine, and possibly in the semen, in the first days after treatment. A barrier method such as a condom would confer protection against possible transfer of BCG to the sexual partner. However, I am not aware of any data that quantifies the presence of BCG in the urethra or the ejaculate after treatment. Nor have I ever heard of a case of the sexual partner becoming infected with BCG. Neither have several other bladder cancer experts to whom I posed the question. Clearly, we could all use better information on this point. Practically, I believe the risk, if any, must be small.

    Q: What type of follow-up is recommended for patients following cystectomy?

    A: The data on this topic is limited and individual practice patterns are somewhat arbitrary. In my own practice, I believe the follow-up needs to take into account two equally important issues: possible tumor recurrence (metastases from original bladder tumor; new onset upper tract urothelial tumor); and monitoring of urinary tract kidney function. In addition, every cystectomy patient has some type of urinary diversion and is at increased risk for urinary infection, stones and ureteral obstruction from fibrosis or tumor. I see every postop cystectomy patient every 3 months during the first year and obtain:

    • CBC, lytes, creatinine
    • Chest X-Ray
    • Abdomen/pelvic CT
    • Urinalysis
    • Liver function tests every 6 mos

    During years 2 and 3 following cycstectomy, the frequency of the above follow-up regimen remains:

    • Every 3 months for patients who were stage T2,T3,T,4 or anyT,node positive
    • Every 6 months for patients who were stage To,T1, node negative

    After year 3 I follow patients annually. The frequency of long term follow-up imaging recently has been a subject of controversy. While statistics indicate that recurrence after 3 years is unlikely, and that many patients with metastases present with symptoms, my 30-year bladder cancer practice has shown that patients are not statistics, and that unusual recurrences can arise at any time. In addition, the increasing numbers of patients with neobladders require other long term follow-up concerns arising from the need to maintain adequate voiding and possible metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. In short, I believe every patient who undergoes cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer requires and deserves lifelong annual urologic follow-up.